Dive deeper

Open any topic for the full explanation, tables, clinical checkpoints, and references.

Full-length video Where can I learn more about skin-cancer wound repair?
When is the skin-cancer wound repair chosen?

Direct Answer

Your repair will be chosen after the skin cancer is completely removed and the surgeon can see the final wound. The best option is not automatically the smallest operation, the shortest scar, or the most elaborate flap. It is the least burdensome repair that reliably protects function, restores coverage and contour, and respects the landmarks beside the wound.

The choices include:

  • allowing the wound to heal naturally without stitches;
  • bringing the edges together as a planned line;
  • moving nearby skin as a flap;
  • borrowing skin from another site as a graft;
  • adding cartilage or another layer of support;
  • using a repair completed in more than one stage;
  • delaying the repair for a specific reason; or
  • involving another reconstructive specialist.
Why cannot the repair be promised before Mohs?

Why the Repair Cannot Be Promised Before Mohs

A biopsy identifies the cancer, but it does not draw the exact underground border. A tumor can extend farther beneath the surface than the visible spot suggests. Mohs surgery removes a mapped layer, examines the properly processed peripheral and deep margin, and returns only to the mapped area where cancer remains. That method can preserve healthy tissue, especially when a tumor has hidden extension.[1–3]

The final wound can therefore be wider, deeper, or closer to an important structure than anyone could prove from a photograph. Two spots that look similar from above may leave very different wounds:

  • one may be shallow and close comfortably as a line;
  • another may reach the nostril rim, eyelid, lip, ear cartilage, tendon, or another structure that needs protection;
  • a third may be well suited to natural healing; and
  • a fourth may require a graft, flap, structural support, staging, or collaboration.

This uncertainty does not prevent good planning. Before surgery, the surgeon can study the likely defect, nearby tissue, your medical history, medications, and priorities. An honest plan contains branches. The final branch is selected when the margin is clear and prediction becomes anatomy.

Which six questions usually determine the repair?

The Six Questions That Usually Determine the Repair

1. How large and deep is the wound?

Surface diameter is only the beginning. A broad, shallow wound can require a different repair from a smaller wound that extends through fat, muscle, cartilage, lining, periosteum, or another supporting layer. Reconstruction must replace the tissues that function and contour actually require.

2. Where is it?

Skin moves differently on the cheek, scalp, nose, eyelid, lip, ear, hand, and lower leg. A closure that is straightforward on the cheek may pull an eyelid downward or notch a nostril.

3. What must not move?

Eyelid margins, nostril rims, lip borders, mouth corners, eyebrows, ear rims, and hairlines are visible or functional landmarks. The repair should direct tension away from them.

4. What tissue is available nearby?

Nearby skin often gives the closest color, thickness, and texture match. It may not move safely when prior surgery, radiation, scarring, poor circulation, or the wound itself has changed its blood supply.

5. What does the patient's health allow?

Bleeding risk, nicotine exposure, immune status, diabetes, circulation, mobility, anesthesia needs, and the ability to return for staged care can change the plan. Age alone does not decide the repair.

6. What matters most to the patient?

Some people strongly prefer a one-stage repair. Others will accept a temporary open wound or a staged flap to protect contour or function. A technically possible repair is not automatically the best fit for every person's priorities and care burden.

What are the main skin-cancer repair choices?

The Main Repair Choices

The Main Repair Choices
RepairWhat it doesWhen it may fitMain tradeoff
Second-intention healingLets the wound fill, contract, and grow new skin without stitchesSelected wounds where contraction will not distort an important structureA longer visible healing period and repair-specific wound care
Linear closureBrings the edges together in a planned lineWounds with enough movable skin and a safe direction of tensionThe final line may be longer than the original wound
Local flapMoves nearby skin while keeping its blood supply attachedWhen skin match, contour, or tension direction mattersAdditional incision lines and careful design
Full-thickness skin graftTransfers skin from a donor site onto the woundWhen moving nearby skin could distort anatomy or surface coverage is the main needColor, thickness, texture, or contour may differ
Structural supportAdds cartilage or another supporting layerSelected nose, ear, or other three-dimensional defectsAn additional donor site or greater complexity
Staged flapMoves reliable tissue in two or more planned proceduresLarger, deeper, or multilayer nasal and other complex defectsA temporary tissue bridge and at least one later procedure
Delayed repairWaits before definitive reconstructionSelected grafts, pathology clarification, wound-bed preparation, medical coordination, or specialist planningA temporary open wound and another visit
CollaborationAdds the specialist or setting the wound requiresAirway, lining, bone, major eyelid or lip function, free-tissue transfer, anesthesia, or patient preferenceMore coordination and sometimes a separate procedure

The main management choices are direct closure, a local flap, a skin graft, natural healing, or a selected staged or delayed repair.12

There is no universal winner. The useful comparison is: What problem will this option solve, and what new problem might it create?

Why can a longer line be the simpler repair?

Why a Longer Line Can Be the Simpler Repair

Patients understandably focus on incision length. Surgeons also focus on direction, tension, nearby landmarks, and contour.

A round wound cannot usually be closed as a short circle. The surgeon may lengthen the ends so the skin lies flat and the tension spreads along a planned line. A longer, low-tension scar placed near a natural crease may heal more quietly than a shorter closure that pulls on an eyelid, lip, or nostril.

A straight-line closure is not a lesser reconstruction. When the tissue moves safely, it may be the most elegant way to solve the problem.

What is a flap, and when might it fit?

What Is a Flap?

A local flap moves nearby skin into the wound while preserving its blood supply. Nearby skin often gives the closest match in color, thickness, texture, and sun exposure. A flap can also redirect tension away from a free margin.

The tradeoff is that a flap creates additional incision lines and depends on thoughtful design. It should not be selected simply because it sounds advanced. It earns its place when nearby tissue solves the wound better than a line, graft, or natural healing.

What is a skin graft, and when might it fit?

What Is a Skin Graft?

A skin graft borrows skin from another site and places it over the wound. Unlike a flap, it is disconnected from its original blood supply and must establish circulation from the wound bed.

A graft can be useful when moving nearby skin would distort an important structure, when local skin is limited, or when a broad, shallow wound needs coverage. A graft may look lighter, darker, smoother, shinier, thicker, or more depressed than nearby skin. Those tradeoffs do not make it a failed flap. They define what a graft can and cannot solve.

Observational studies have compared nasal flaps and grafts, but surgeons generally choose the two techniques for different wounds. A cohort that favors one repair cannot prove that it is best for every nasal defect.4

Can the wound heal without stitches?

Can the Wound Heal Without Stitches?

Yes. This is called second-intention healing. The wound fills from the base, contracts, and grows new skin from the edges.

Second intention is not unfinished care. In a selected wound, it avoids another incision or donor site and can blend well with the surrounding contour. The classic teaching is that concave areas often tolerate contraction better than convex surfaces. That is a useful tendency, not a law. Size, depth, exposed cartilage or bone, nearby free margins, blood supply, body site, and healing capacity all matter.[5–7]

The tradeoff is an open wound for a variable period. A selected facial wound may resurface in several weeks, while a lower-leg wound can take much longer. Because location and health change both timeline and risk, the treating team's wound-care instructions control.

Why do different body sites need different repair thinking?

Why the Nose, Eyelid, Lip, Ear, Hand, and Lower Leg Need Different Thinking

Nose

The nose is skin cover, contour, cartilage support, internal lining, free margins, and an airway. A repair that fills the wound but flattens a nostril or narrows breathing has not solved the whole problem. Shallow wounds may fit a line, flap, graft, or natural healing. Deeper wounds may need cartilage, lining, or staged tissue.

Eyelid

The eyelid must protect the eye, blink, sit against the globe, and preserve tear drainage. A small amount of downward pull can matter. Selected wounds can be repaired by a Mohs surgeon; margin-involving, deeper, or tear-drainage defects may benefit from oculoplastic collaboration.8,9

Lip

The lip must preserve oral competence, motion, the red-white border, and the mouth corner. A repair that looks acceptable at rest can still interfere with eating, speech, or expression.10

Ear

Thin skin lies over complex cartilage with little extra tissue. Natural healing, a graft, a wedge, or a flap can each fit a selected defect. Cartilage exposure and rim support change the plan.11

Hand and lower leg

On the hand, tendon, nerve, motion, and grip can outweigh appearance. On the lower leg, circulation, swelling, mobility, and slower healing may dominate. Facial reconstruction rules should not be copied automatically to either site.

Will reconstruction happen the same day?

Will Reconstruction Happen the Same Day?

Often, yes. Once Mohs confirms clear margins, many wounds are repaired during the same visit. In a large US database containing more than 600,000 Mohs cases, same-day repair codes appeared in roughly four out of five cases. The remaining group can include natural healing, deliberate delay, referral, or incomplete coding, so the study describes practice patterns rather than a rule.12

Delay or staging may fit when:

  • the repair requires more than one planned procedure;
  • a selected graft may benefit from a prepared wound bed;
  • additional pathology or tumor information is needed;
  • medical optimization or a different anesthesia setting is appropriate;
  • swelling, tissue viability, or complex anatomy should be observed;
  • another specialist should participate; or
  • the patient wants time to consider the realistic choices.

In one older cohort of selected nasal tip and ala wounds, delaying a full-thickness skin graft for 12 to 14 days was associated with less partial graft loss than immediate grafting. That finding does not mean every nasal graft should be delayed. It shows that timing can be a reconstructive tool.13,14

What can the repair outcome evidence promise?

What the Outcome Evidence Can—and Cannot—Promise

Mohs surgery is very safe overall. In a prospective multicenter study of 20,821 procedures at 23 centers, investigators recorded 149 adverse events, an overall rate of 0.72%, with no deaths or permanent disabilities.15 That population average is reassuring. It is not a personal guarantee for one complex flap, graft, or medically fragile patient.

Possible reconstructive complications include bleeding, infection, wound separation, partial flap or graft loss, contour change, free-margin distortion, scar symptoms, or revision. Risk depends on the wound, repair, site, medications, nicotine exposure, immune status, diabetes, circulation, previous radiation, and follow-up.

Appearance also changes with time. Swelling, redness, firmness, and contour can improve for months. Prospective patient-reported research shows that appearance-related quality of life and satisfaction can continue improving through the first year after Mohs surgery.16 No responsible surgeon can promise an invisible scar. The goal is a planned healing pathway that preserves function and produces an acceptable contour and scar.

What numbers help put repair outcomes in context?

Evidence by the Numbers

Evidence by the NumbersOverall Mohs safety is reassuring, but a population average is not a personal guarantee

Overall Mohs safety is reassuring, but a population average is not a personal guarantee

20,821 procedures / 149 adverse events / 0.72%

Population
Patients undergoing Mohs micrographic surgery at 23 US centers in a prospective multicenter cohort
Outcome
Adverse events associated with the procedure, including serious outcomes
Time horizon
Perioperative and postoperative follow-up reported for each procedure

What it means: Mohs surgery had a very low overall adverse-event rate, with no deaths or permanent disabilities in this cohort.

Limitations: The average combines many tumors, body sites, repairs, and patient risk profiles. It does not predict the risk of one large flap, graft, staged reconstruction, or medically complex patient.

References: 15

Evidence by the NumbersA planned delay can be a reconstructive tool for a selected nasal graft

A planned delay can be a reconstructive tool for a selected nasal graft

11% vs 30% partial graft loss

Population
Selected nasal tip and ala wounds receiving a full-thickness skin graft in an older cohort
Outcome
Partial graft loss after grafting delayed 12 to 14 days compared with immediate grafting
Time horizon
Postoperative graft-healing follow-up

What it means: In this selected cohort, delayed grafting was associated with less partial graft loss, showing why timing can be part of the repair rather than a measure of efficiency alone.

Limitations: This was not a modern randomized trial and does not establish that every nasal graft should be delayed. Wound selection, technique, and current practice matter.

References: 13, 14

Who performs the reconstruction?

Who Performs the Repair?

Fellowship-trained Mohs surgeons learn cancer removal, margin interpretation, and reconstruction as one discipline. Training standards require substantial supervised experience, and Mohs surgeons perform a large share of reconstruction in cosmetically and functionally sensitive sites.17,18

That does not mean one specialty title is always superior. Collaboration may add value when the final defect involves:

  • major nasal lining, airway, cartilage, or bone loss;
  • complex eyelid, tear-duct, lip, mouth-corner, hand, tendon, or nerve anatomy;
  • free-tissue transfer;
  • general anesthesia or monitoring needs;
  • severe medical complexity; or
  • a patient preference that changes the plan.

The meaningful questions are:

  1. Does the clinician routinely perform the repair being proposed?
  2. Can the clinician explain why it fits the final wound?
  3. Which function or landmark is being protected?
  4. What reasonable alternatives were considered?
  5. Would collaboration add a capability the case needs?
What should I ask before skin-cancer surgery?

Questions to Ask Before Surgery

  1. Which repairs are most likely for this location?
  2. What part of the plan cannot be known until the cancer is clear?
  3. Which tissue layers, functions, or landmarks may need protection?
  4. What would make natural healing, a line, a flap, or a graft a better fit?
  5. When would you delay, stage, or involve another specialist?
  6. Do you routinely perform the repairs you are discussing?
  7. What result should I expect in the first weeks, and when is it reasonable to judge the mature scar?
  8. Where will I receive the instructions for my exact repair?
Frequently asked questions about wound repair

Frequently Asked Questions

Does every facial wound need plastic surgery?

Every reconstruction uses plastic-surgery principles, but every wound does not require a plastic surgeon. Fellowship-trained Mohs surgeons are dermatologic surgeons who routinely reconstruct facial skin-cancer defects. Selected wounds benefit from another reconstructive specialist.

Is a graft worse than a flap?

No. They solve different problems. A flap moves nearby skin; a graft can avoid pulling on nearby anatomy or cover a wound efficiently.

Does no stitches mean nothing was done?

No. Second-intention healing can be a deliberate reconstruction selected because natural contraction is expected to work well for that wound.

Will the scar be invisible?

No surgery can promise that. The aim is to protect function, restore contour, and guide the wound into the most favorable healing pathway available.

Can I choose the simplest option?

Yes—but “simplest” should mean the least burdensome option that still protects the anatomy and heals predictably, not merely the option with the fewest incision lines.

Where can I find wound-care instructions?

Use the repair-specific instructions from your treating team. The correct care varies by wound, body site, repair, and medical history.

Where should I go next in the Patient Journey?

Next Steps in the Patient Journey

After the cancer is clear, ask your surgeon to show you the final wound, explain which tissue layers and landmarks matter, compare the realistic choices, and tell you why the recommended repair fits your anatomy, health, and priorities.

Continue in the Patient Journey to the focused guide that matches your repair or healing plan.

Who reviewed and authored this repair guide?
Portrait of Dr. Thomas L.H. Hocker

About the Author

Dr. Thomas L.H. Hocker is a Harvard- and Mayo Clinic-trained, triple board-certified dermatologist, Mohs surgeon, and dermatopathologist. He is the Founding Director of Dermatologic Surgery at the UMKC School of Medicine and University Health and an Iron Surgeon lecturer at the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery. His work focuses on Mohs surgery for melanoma, complex and rare skin tumors, and aesthetic reconstruction after skin-cancer treatment. He co-authored the best-selling textbook Review of Dermatology and created Skin Trust to give patients and clinicians free access to clear, current, evidence-based education.

Read Dr. Hocker's background and mission

Dr. Hocker earned his bachelor's degree with honors from Yale University, where he was inducted into Phi Beta Kappa. As a Winston Churchill Scholar, he then studied at the University of Cambridge and earned an M.Phil. in Organic Chemistry. He received his M.D. with honors from Harvard Medical School, where his research focused on melanoma genetics. He completed dermatology residency at Mayo Clinic, a dermatopathology fellowship at the University of Michigan, and a Mohs micrographic and reconstructive surgery fellowship at Mayo Clinic. He is board-certified in Dermatology, Dermatopathology, and Mohs Micrographic Surgery.

Dr. Hocker serves as the Founding Director of Dermatologic Surgery at the UMKC School of Medicine and University Health. He is an internationally invited lecturer and speaker who teaches about Mohs surgery for melanoma, complex and rare tumors, dermatopathology, and aesthetic reconstruction after skin-cancer treatment. He has also been selected as an Iron Surgeon lecturer by the American Society for Dermatologic Surgery. He is the co-author of Review of Dermatology, a best-selling dermatology review textbook, and he continues to teach and mentor medical students, residents, and physicians.

Skin Trust exists because Dr. Hocker believes access to excellent medical knowledge should not depend on geography, wealth, or proximity to a major academic center. After training at several of the world's leading institutions, he sees that education as both a gift and a responsibility: to translate current evidence, expert judgment, and hard-won clinical experience into guidance that patients, families, and clinicians can actually use.

The mission is to increase awareness, reduce avoidable suffering, and give every person equal access to trustworthy, up-to-date information that can help them make the best decisions for their life. Skin Trust also extends Dr. Hocker's lifelong commitment to teaching, writing, and mentoring medical students and residents as they build lives and careers of purpose and service.

For Dr. Hocker, this work is also an expression of faith. He regards the opportunities to learn at Yale, Cambridge, Harvard, Mayo Clinic, and the University of Michigan as blessings from God. Teaching, writing, mentoring, and building Skin Trust are ways to pay those blessings forward in service to patients, learners, and the broader community. His faith is the personal motivation to do this work carefully, generously, and with integrity; it is not a condition of using or benefiting from this free resource.

References for this skin-cancer repair guide

References

  1. Müller FM, Dawe RS, Moseley H, Fleming CJ. Randomized comparison of Mohs micrographic surgery and surgical excision for small nodular basal cell carcinoma: tissue-sparing outcome. Dermatol Surg. 2009;35(9):1349-1354. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01240.x.
  2. Smeets NWJ, Krekels GAM, Ostertag JU, et al. Surgical excision vs Mohs' micrographic surgery for basal-cell carcinoma of the face: randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;364(9447):1766-1772. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17399-6.
  3. van Kester MS, Goeman JJ, Genders RE. Tissue-sparing properties of Mohs micrographic surgery for infiltrative basal cell carcinoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(6):1700-1703. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.057.
  4. Jacobs MA, Christenson LJ, Weaver AL, et al. Clinical outcome of cutaneous flaps versus full-thickness skin grafts after Mohs surgery on the nose. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36(1):23-30. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01360.x.
  5. Mott KJ, Clark DP, Stelljes LS. Regional variation in wound contraction of Mohs surgery defects allowed to heal by second intention. Dermatol Surg. 2003;29(7):712-722.
  6. Kim DNW, Kibbi N, Christensen SR, Leffell DJ, Suozzi KC. Factors affecting outcomes of second-intent healing of nasal defects after Mohs micrographic surgery. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023;315(1):67-73. doi:10.1007/s00403-021-02306-y.
  7. van der Eerden PA, Lohuis PJFM, Hart AAM, Mulder WC, Vuyk H. Secondary intention healing after excision of nonmelanoma skin cancer of the head and neck. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(6):1747-1755. doi:10.1097/PRS.0b013e31818a9aaa.
  8. Patel SY, Itani K. Review of eyelid reconstruction techniques after Mohs surgery. Semin Plast Surg. 2018;32(2):95-102. doi:10.1055/s-0038-1642058.
  9. Archibald LK, et al. Periorbital reconstructive techniques following Mohs micrographic surgery or excisions: a systematic review. Arch Dermatol Res. 2023;315(7):1853-1861. doi:10.1007/s00403-022-02523-z.
  10. Sanniec K, Harirah M, Thornton JF. Lip reconstruction after Mohs cancer excision: lessons learned from 615 consecutive cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(2):533-542. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000006509.
  11. Bittner GC, Kubo EM, Fantini BC, Cerci FB. Auricular reconstruction after Mohs micrographic surgery: analysis of 101 cases. An Bras Dermatol. 2021;96(4):408-415. doi:10.1016/j.abd.2020.12.008.
  12. Dowdle TS, Schmidt M, Winsett FT, Wagner RF. National trends in repair type selection after Mohs micrographic surgery: a benchmark analysis using TriNetX. Dermatol Surg. 2026;52(4):307-309. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000004851.
  13. Robinson JK, Dillig G. The advantages of delayed nasal full-thickness skin grafting after Mohs micrographic surgery. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28(9):845-851. doi:10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.02031.x.
  14. Shah KS, Shah KS, Sharma AN, Song DH. Delayed full-thickness skin grafting after skin cancer resection: a systematic review. Dermatol Surg. 2026;52(5):433-439. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000004945.
  15. Alam M, Ibrahim O, Nodzenski M, et al. Adverse events associated with Mohs micrographic surgery: multicenter prospective cohort study of 20,821 cases at 23 centers. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(12):1378-1385. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6255.
  16. Veldhuizen IJ, Dusza SW, Kuo A, et al. Patient-reported quality of life and aesthetic satisfaction continues to improve for 1 year after Mohs surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2025;93(2):444-450. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2025.03.022.
  17. Tan A, Castner NB, Slutsky JB. Mohs surgeons dominate cutaneous reconstructions in cosmetically and functionally sensitive sites: Medicare trends from 2013 to 2019. Dermatol Surg. 2023;49(6):539-543. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000003787.
  18. American College of Mohs Surgery. Membership and dues: associate membership case-log requirements. Accessed July 24, 2026. https://www.mohscollege.org/members/membership-and-dues.